
5 Reasons You Shouldn’t Sleep on Sandler
Sales methodologies have become a hot topic in the last couple of years. As the post-COVID...
Read MoreSelect Page
Sally is a Director of Sales Enablement that is passionate about data-driven enablement. With 10+ years of experience across sales, marketing, and enablement roles, Sally contributes to the enablement community through the Revenue Enablement Society as an Associate Board Member, and can often be found helping others in the The Enablement Squad Slack.
Posted by Sally Ladrach | Jan 5, 2025 | Sales Enablement |
Sales methodologies have become a hot topic in the last couple of years. As the post-COVID...
Read MorePosted by Sally Ladrach | Nov 10, 2024 | Sales Enablement |
I recently read a book by Joshua Seiden, one he wrote to help software product teams better...
Read MorePosted by Sally Ladrach | Oct 18, 2024 | Sales Enablement |
Have you ever seen an Enablement conference keynote or webinar titled “How Our Enablement Charter Saved the Organization”?
Me neither.
And yet, we spend an absurd amount of time and effort finding templates, customizing them, meeting with stakeholders, explaining (for the tenth time) what exactly Revenue Enablement does, and getting all of our stakeholders to literally sign on the dotted line… only to end up with the same problems we had before.
We fight fires.
We become fixers of broken things.
Sellers still think of us as harbingers of pointless busywork (training), instead of strategic partners in their success.
As a profession, we in enablement give far too much stock to these charters. We cling to them like they’re some magical shield that will save us from the chaos of stakeholder requests. We find the perfect template, make it our own, and get the “buy-in” we so desperately covet.
And yet, the same issues arise—the very ones we wrote a charter to save us from in the first place.
So why don’t I like charters? Here’s where I’ve seen them fail, and how we can fix it.
Read MoreIt’s the culmination of a weeks-long standoff between Elon Musk’s DOGE team and the United States Institute of Peace.
The Institute of Museum and Library Services has long received bipartisan support. But after years of trying, President Donald Trump has delivered it a crushing blow.
The academic and author discusses what to expect from the singularity, the need for AI self-correcting mechanisms, and what hope there is for superintelligence safeguarding democracy.
The documents reveal a DOGE affiliate is attempting to transfer the headquarters of an independent think tank, the United States Institute of Peace, to the government at no cost.
The news follows the breakout success of DeepSeek and growing pressure from rivals like Meta.